Is Satan already permanently cast out of heaven? The evidence strongly suggests no, not yet. We have clear scriptural snapshots showing the Adversary (Hebrew: Satan; Greek: Diabolos) having access to God's presence in the heavenly realms long after any supposed primordial fall.
The book of Job provides the most explicit picture. In Job 1:6 and 2:1, we read, "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before YHWH, and Satan also came among them." This isn't presented as a past event, but as something occurring during the time frame of the story. Satan stands among the "sons of God" (divine beings, angels) before YHWH. He engages in direct conversation with God, challenging Job's integrity and receiving permission, albeit limited, to afflict him. This demonstrates not only his access to God's presence but also his operation entirely under God's sovereign control. He is an accuser functioning within the divine council, not an independent rebel already banished.
Zechariah 3:1-2, written centuries after Job's time (around 520 BC), presents a remarkably similar scene. Zechariah sees a vision: "Then he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of YHWH, and Satan standing at his right hand to accuse him. And YHWH said to Satan, 'YHWH rebuke you, O Satan! YHWH who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you!'" Again, Satan is present in what appears to be the heavenly court, fulfilling his role as the accuser (satan literally means "adversary" or "accuser" in Hebrew) against God's high priest. YHWH rebukes him, but his presence there is undeniable.
Moving to the New Testament, Jesus Himself speaks of Satan in ways that imply ongoing heavenly access or influence. In Luke 10:18, after the disciples report their authority over demons, Jesus says, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven." This is often misinterpreted as referring to a past, primordial fall. However, the context suggests Jesus is speaking prophetically or symbolically about the consequences of the disciples' successful ministry, their authority over demons signifies a decisive blow to Satan's power, a foreshadowing of his ultimate defeat and expulsion. It's a statement about the impact of the kingdom's advance, not necessarily a historical account of a past event or his permanent location at that moment. Later, Jesus tells Peter, "Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you..." (Luke 22:31-32). This "demanding" sounds very much like the kind of petition Satan made before God regarding Job, suggesting continued access to make such requests.
Paul refers to Satan as "the god of this age" (2 Corinthians 4:4) and "the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience" (Ephesians 2:2). While "prince of the power of the air" might suggest a domain lower than the highest heaven where God dwells, it still implies a position of significant authority in the spiritual realms above the earth, not confinement below it. Paul also speaks of our struggle being against "spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places" (Ephesians 6:12), indicating the conflict zone includes the heavens.
The definitive passage describing Satan's expulsion from heaven is Revelation 12:7-12. This passage depicts a future war in heaven: "Now war arose in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon. And the dragon and his angels fought back, but he was defeated, and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world, he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him." The timing of this event within Revelation's structure appears to be mid-Tribulation. A voice in heaven then rejoices, "Now the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ have come, for the accuser of our brothers has been thrown down, who accuses them day and night before our God." This explicitly links Satan's expulsion from heaven with the cessation of his role as the accuser before God, a role we saw him fulfilling in Job and Zechariah. If he is still accusing believers before God "day and night" until this future war, he cannot have been permanently cast out long ago.
Therefore, the consistent biblical picture is that Satan, while operating under God's ultimate sovereignty and permission, currently retains access to the heavenly realms and God's presence, primarily fulfilling the role of the accuser. His definitive, permanent expulsion from heaven is a future event described in Revelation 12.
Now, what about "Lucifer's fall"? This idea comes almost entirely from a single passage in Isaiah 14, specifically verses 12-15 (KJV): "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell [Sheol], to the sides of the pit."
Generations have read this as an account of Satan's original rebellion and fall from grace. However, this interpretation completely ignores the explicit context of Isaiah 14. The entire chapter is a taunt song (a mashal) directed against the King of Babylon (Isaiah 14:4). The prophecy describes the arrogance, ambition, and ultimate downfall of this human king, who sought godlike status but would end up dead in Sheol (the grave, the state of the dead) like any other mortal (Isaiah 14:9-11, 15-20).
The name "Lucifer" itself is a Latin translation (from Jerome's Vulgate) of the Hebrew Helel ben Shachar (הֵילֵל בֶּן-שָׁחַר), meaning "Shining One, son of the Dawn," referring to the morning star (Venus). It was used metaphorically to describe the Babylonian king's former brilliance and perceived high status before his fall. There is absolutely no biblical basis for identifying this "Shining One" with Satan. Jesus is actually called the "bright morning star" in Revelation 22:16! Applying Isaiah 14 to Satan is a classic example of taking a passage completely out of its historical and literary context and imposing a later theological idea onto it. The concept of "Lucifer" as a name for Satan and Isaiah 14 as the story of his fall is a tradition, largely popularized by works like Dante's Inferno and Milton's Paradise Lost, not a direct teaching of scripture.
Similarly, Ezekiel 28:11-19, another passage sometimes applied to Satan's fall, is explicitly directed against the King of Tyre (Ezekiel 28:12). It uses exalted, Edenic imagery ("You were in Eden, the garden of God... You were an anointed guardian cherub") to describe the king's former privileged position and wisdom, likely granted by God, before his heart became proud due to his beauty and splendor, leading to his corruption and violent downfall. While the language is highly symbolic and evokes primordial themes, the direct application is to a human ruler whose pride led to judgment. Attributing this passage to Satan requires allegorizing it away from its stated subject and ignoring the specific historical context of judgment against Tyre.
So, the popular notion of a glorious archangel named Lucifer rebelling against God in primordial times and being cast from heaven finds no solid support in the passages often used to defend it. Scripture simply doesn't give us a detailed account of Satan's origin or a specific "fall" event in the distant past. It introduces him as an adversary already functioning within God's council in Job and Zechariah, and prophesies his future expulsion from heaven in Revelation.
What about "fallen angels" and Tartarus? The Bible does speak of angels who sinned and faced judgment. The key passages are 2 Peter 2:4 and Jude 6:
"For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but cast them into hell [tartarōsas] and committed them to chains of gloomy darkness to be kept until the judgment..." (2 Peter 2:4 ESV)
"And the angels who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling, he has kept in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment of the great day" (Jude 6 ESV)
Both passages refer to a specific group of angels who committed a particular sin, abandoning their proper domain, and are currently being held in confinement ("chains of gloomy darkness," specifically Tartarus in Peter's unique terminology) awaiting a future judgment. Jude 7 immediately links their sin to that of Sodom and Gomorrah indulging in "sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire [sarkos heteras, 'other flesh']". This strongly connects the sin of these angels to the event described in Genesis 6:1-4, where the "sons of God" (understood as angels in intertestamental Jewish tradition, e.g., 1 Enoch, Jubilees, and likely by Peter and Jude) took human wives, resulting in the Nephilim. This act was seen as a gross violation of the created order, mixing heavenly and earthly realms, and contributing to the corruption that led to the Flood.
So, these specific "fallen angels" associated with the Genesis 6 event are currently imprisoned in Tartarus (a term borrowed from Greek mythology for the deepest abyss, used here by Peter perhaps to resonate with his audience, signifying a place of deep confinement). They are not the same as Satan and his angels who are currently active in the world and heavens (Ephesians 2:2; 6:12) and who will fight Michael in the future (Revelation 12). Tartarus is a specific holding place for a particular group of judged angels, awaiting the final judgment. It is not the general "hell" for wicked humans, nor is it Satan's current domain.
In summary:
Satan currently retains access to heaven and God's presence, primarily acting as the accuser under God's sovereign permission. His permanent expulsion to earth is a future event, likely occurring mid-Tribulation (Revelation 12).
The idea of "Lucifer's fall" based on Isaiah 14 (or Ezekiel 28) is a misinterpretation of passages directed against human kings (Babylon and Tyre). Scripture doesn't detail Satan's origin or a specific primordial fall.
The "fallen angels" currently imprisoned in Tartarus (2 Peter 2:4; Jude 6) are likely those involved in the Genesis 6 incident, who violated boundaries by taking human wives. They are distinct from Satan and his currently active demonic forces.
Understanding these distinctions, based on careful reading of the relevant passages in context, clears away much of the mythology and tradition that often surrounds these figures and allows us to see what scripture actually does (and doesn't) say about the Adversary and other rebellious spiritual beings.
No comments:
Post a Comment